Re: Obamas not invited to wedding
- From: "wulfit" <wulfit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:35:29 -0000
The union is to be dissolved? Yay!
As an honorary Scot, I have waited for this day. No offence to the English but we are very happy to run our own affairs north of the wall. You may peek over the wall on a clear day, but that's as far as you get.
Having told us that it is going to happen, would you tell us when?
At least all those many, many people who keep incorrectly saying the "queen of England" will finally be correct.
Louis Epstein - after the event, would you choose to be a subject in the Kingdom of Scotland or the Kingdom of England. It is unlikely that either will be absolute monarchies.
"Louis Epstein" <le@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:iemcj2$3cu$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wulfit <wulfit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
: "Donald4564" <dbinks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: news:81e2844c-5bed-4708-a561-75e5be723744@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: On Dec 19, 12:33 am, "wulfit" <wul...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:> The link below is allegedly about the Obamas not being invited and that it
:> is therefore (allegedly) a snub. Of course there's no way of knowing what
:> went on behind the scenes, and it may be by mutual agreement that the
:> Obamas
:> are not going. The president usually has more important things to do
:> anyway. What is more intriguing is the poll attached to the link -
:> supposedly, over 80% of respondents believe the Obamas should not be
:> invited. I wonder why there is such a strong feeling about it? Do people
:> in the UK have something against the Obamas? Although it is not a state
:> occasion, William and Kate will be king and queen one day, so it must be
:> up
:> there with the important events of 2011.
:>
:> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1339315/President-Obama-snubb...
:>
:> I'd also be willing to bet that Princess Fergie won't be invited. Until
:> her
:> recent travails, she may have stood a fighting chance, but since she has
:> been profoundly putting her foot in her mouth again, no way. Of course she
:> has a history of putting her foot in her mouth, and for a while there she
:> was also putting it in other peoples' mouths, but that no longer appears
:> to
:> be the case. On the other hand, she could always flog the rights to the
:> wedding, subject to a finders' fee. Louis Epstein, would you invite her if
:> you were in charge?
:
: I daresay it's a case of inviting whomsoever you desire to your
: wedding. Does the Prince William actually know the Obamas on an
: intimate friendly basis? Does Ms. Middleton? If they don't then why
: should they invite them? This is not to be a State occasion so the
: State does not have a say in inviting the usual poobahs who clutter up
: such events.
:
: Regards
: Donald BInks
: ---------------------------------------
: I don't disagree with you, on the grounds that it isn't a state occasion,
: although I think it odd that a US president is not invited to the wedding of
: a future king of the UK (note, I did not say king of England, as so many
: would, including David Cameron while he was at the recent FIFA bash, and he
: of all people should know better).
Perhaps he was forecasting the dissolution of the Union
prior to the prospective Accession of William V.
-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Obamas not invited to wedding
- From: Louis Epstein
- Re: Obamas not invited to wedding
- References:
- Obamas not invited to wedding
- From: wulfit
- Re: Obamas not invited to wedding
- From: Donald4564
- Re: Obamas not invited to wedding
- From: wulfit
- Re: Obamas not invited to wedding
- From: Louis Epstein
- Obamas not invited to wedding
- Prev by Date: Re: Pr Charles' Car Attacked
- Next by Date: Re: Obamas not invited to wedding
- Previous by thread: Re: Obamas not invited to wedding
- Next by thread: Re: Obamas not invited to wedding
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|