Re: 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- From: Sacha <sacha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:04:07 +0100
On 9/4/08 11:33, in article
424c6512-6bdf-43f4-a2e1-fe22d9885368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"volcaran@xxxxxxx" <volcaran@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
My guess would be the clock started as soon as there was evidence
(even if disputed) an alcohol fuelled driver driving recklessly at
twice the speed limit was involved. After all there was ample
opportunity for a protective claim to be lodged pending other judicial
proceedings. Of course it is possible legal moves have been made
although some of those with cause have been calling for matters to be
finally put to bed so pursuing an action perhaps seems unlikely.
I can't see the princes suing him but I don't know if Trevor Rees has
indicated that he won't. And of course there are others he put under
pressure to lie for him and obfuscate the facts. Perhaps they would have a
case under English law with regard to stress or harassment.
--
Sacha
.
- References:
- 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- From: mjcar
- Re: 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- From: Sacha
- Re: 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- From: CJ Buyers
- Re: 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- From: volcaran
- Re: 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- From: CJ Buyers
- Re: 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- From: volcaran
- 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- Prev by Date: Re: Royal styles in Spain
- Next by Date: Re: ?? HRH Princess Katherine A. Plantagenet - d. 3/26/2008 ?????
- Previous by thread: Re: 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- Next by thread: Re: 'Princess Diana': jury's verdict
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|