Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Turenne <richard.lichten1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:31:06 -0700
Sacha wrote:
I'm afraid it was a response not to you but a joke about the original naming of Harold Brown as George Brown.
My fault; I'm getting touchy in my old age!
The identity of the individual concerned has been reported in the
European press and on American websites, making the suppression of the
name (of the blackmailee) by the court somewhat redundant. I've tried
Le Monde and Die Zeit without any success, but maybe I'm asking the
wrong question.
Richard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Sacha
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- References:
- Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Ron Head
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: pk
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: the_verminator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: pk
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Dave
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Candide
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Lori
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Sacha
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Turenne
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Tom Wilding / Stephen Stillwell
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: pk
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: martynmobile
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: pk
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Turenne
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: pk
- Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- From: Sacha
- Royal Blackmail case in UK
- Prev by Date: Re: Homeopathic Remedies for Royals?
- Next by Date: Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- Previous by thread: Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- Next by thread: Re: Royal Blackmail case in UK
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|