Re: 1917 name change
- From: William Reitwiesner <wmaddams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:49:17 -0400
In article <f2qrmb$knv$1@xxxxxxxx>,
"Katipo" <h.laughland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Ms Smith" <pleyland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1179575853.123552.81010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I've read that George V in 1917 decreed that all male line descendets
of Queen Victoria should bear thew surname Windsor, which of course at
that time meant himself and his sons; his uncle Arthur and cousin
Arthur and infant Alistair..........and of course his uncle Leopold's
family. So where the latter stand as regards this decree ? Surely he
did not expect Prince Charles Edward and his sons to adopt the name
Windsor, although that is what his decree said if taken literally.Ms
Smith
Who is/was Prince Charles Edward??
At the time of the decree (1917), he was the reigning Duke of
Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, the dynasty of which George V was a junior member.
The decree, which purported to alter the titles of several Saxe-Coburg
dynasts, was not issued by the Head of the Saxe-Coburg House, and as
such was invalid. It may have some validity in foreign lands, such as
Britain, but not elsewhere.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1917 name change
- From: CJ Buyers
- Re: 1917 name change
- References:
- 1917 name change
- From: Ms Smith
- Re: 1917 name change
- From: Katipo
- 1917 name change
- Prev by Date: Re: 1917 name change
- Next by Date: Re: "Genetically Challenged" Queen?
- Previous by thread: Re: 1917 name change
- Next by thread: Re: 1917 name change
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|