Re: 1917 name change
- From: "Katipo" <h.laughland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:14:16 -0700
"Ms Smith" <pleyland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1179575853.123552.81010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I've read that George V in 1917 decreed that all male line descendets
of Queen Victoria should bear thew surname Windsor, which of course at
that time meant himself and his sons; his uncle Arthur and cousin
Arthur and infant Alistair..........and of course his uncle Leopold's
family. So where the latter stand as regards this decree ? Surely he
did not expect Prince Charles Edward and his sons to adopt the name
Windsor, although that is what his decree said if taken literally.Ms
Smith
Who is/was Prince Charles Edward??
Queen Elizabeth II later changed the royal surname Mountbatten-Windsor.
While we are on the subject why are William & Harry using the surname Wales
in the army instead of Mountbatten-Windsor, apart from the fact that it is
easier to fit on the name tags?
Katipo I
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1917 name change
- From: Stan Brown
- Re: 1917 name change
- From: Rico
- Re: 1917 name change
- From: William Reitwiesner
- Re: 1917 name change
- From: Candide
- Re: 1917 name change
- References:
- 1917 name change
- From: Ms Smith
- 1917 name change
- Prev by Date: Re: "Genetically Challenged" Queen?
- Next by Date: Re: Royals in the Forces
- Previous by thread: Re: 1917 name change
- Next by thread: Re: 1917 name change
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|