Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: Don Aitken <don-aitken@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:16:52 +0100
On 14 Sep 2006 06:38:30 -0700, "Jan Böhme" <jan.bohme@xxxxx> wrote:
Don Aitken skrev:I'm not entirely sure what you mean. To speak of a descent from
It seems reasonable that anyone who has a descent from anybody
living in western Europe c.800 is more likely than not to be a
Charlemagne descendant.
Don, how do you arrive at that conclusion? I would have understood it
if you had said "a descent from anyone living in Western Europe c.
1600", or some time around that. But as long as we limit ourselves from
decent from someone living in Western Europe c. 800, with no guarantee
of later generations from the this area, I simply can't see how you can
make the statment you do.
Indeed, a descent from Western Europe c.800, but not later, would have
an _extremely_ small chance of including Charlemagne as an acestor.
someone living c.800 cannot possibly imply "but not later". Where the
later generations lived is irrelevant.
--
Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: Jan Böhme
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- References:
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: gro
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: gro
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: Drew
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: gro
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: gro
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: Drew
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: Don Aitken
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- From: Jan Böhme
- Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- Prev by Date: Re: Crown Prince Victor Emmanuel: update
- Next by Date: Re: Crown Prince Victor Emmanuel: update
- Previous by thread: Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- Next by thread: Re: Claims of Royal Descent
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|