Re: What if William IV had had a posthumous child?
- From: "the_verminator@xxxxxxxxxxx" <the_verminator@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Sep 2006 04:54:21 -0700
Michael Rhodes wrote:
carsten1@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
What would
Victoria's status have been then, a former Queen,
If Adelaide had been pregnant in June 1837 an interregnum would have
occurred until the birth of the child and then he/she would have become
Sovereign at birth. Victoria would have remained Princess Victoria
throughout.
Probably; if she were KNOWN to be pregant. Otherwise you get the
wording that actually was used when Victoria succeeded.
.
- References:
- What if William IV had had a posthumous child?
- From: carsten1
- Re: What if William IV had had a posthumous child?
- From: Michael Rhodes
- What if William IV had had a posthumous child?
- Prev by Date: Re: What if William IV had had a posthumous child?
- Next by Date: Re: The choice of name for a new member of the Japanese Royal Family
- Previous by thread: Re: What if William IV had had a posthumous child?
- Next by thread: Re: What if William IV had had a posthumous child?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
