Re: Queen to hand over some duties


Dag T. Hoelseth wrote:
> "Antonio" <abasto@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i melding
> news:1131975951.284216.220810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Dag T. Hoelseth wrote:
> > "Sacha" <sacha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i melding
> > news:BF9D6D97.2384C%sacha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > On 13/11/05 14:41, in article F4idnTy8SKMrzere4p2dnA@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Dag
> T.
> > > Hoelseth" <dhoel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > "Antonio" <abasto@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i melding
> > > > news:1131890313.240681.252570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >>
> > > >> Sacha wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > >>
> > > >> The following is the full text of the article:
> > > >
> > > > You have asked for The Telegraph's permission to put the full text
> here?
> > >
> > > It's online, so I doubt that's a problem.
> >
> > Still no right to put the full text here.
> >
> > --
> > Dag T. Hoelseth
> > dhoel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.geocities.com/dagtho/royalty.html
>
> <<<<<Not that I owe you any explanation whatsoever, but since this copyright
> issue is getting more attention than the royalty issue itself, I would
> like to inform you that I did nothing ilegal in the time and space
> where I posted the message.
>
> I´m in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and the use I made of the article,
> which, by the way, was a nonprofit use of an article that was already
> displayed for free-of-charge public reading on the world wide web, is
> covered by article 46, section III, of the Brazilian Law on Rights of
> Authorship. Under that provision, the quotation in books, newspapes, or
> in any other media, for purposes of study, critic, or debate, is
> authorized, as long as the source of the quoted work is indicated.>>>>
>
> DTH: You didn't make a quote, but put the whole text. A link would have been
> more then enough. That the same text has been displayed free of charge at
> the newspaper's own website does not give you the right to republish it
> here. Brazil is bounded by the WCT just like most other countries. See
> http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/faq/index.htm for more information on
> copyright.

The Brazilian Government can be bound by any convention. I'm bound by
the legislation in force, including any legislation in force to give
effect to that convention. And the law in force allows for quotation.
The protection of copyright is not the same everywhere.

My understanding is that I made a quotation because I used quotes in
the beggining and the end of the text, indicated the source, etc.

Even if I were to republish in a daily or periodic newspaper, a notice
or informative article, already published in another daily or periodic
newspaper, the republishing would still NOT constitute a violation of
copyright under Brazilian Law, as long as I provided the name of the
Author/writer as well as the indication of the source. This is allowed
under article 46, section I of the above mentioned statute.

Again, the law is not the same everywhere, and I complied with the one
that binds me.

>
>
> --
> Dag T. Hoelseth
> dhoel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.geocities.com/dagtho/royalty.html

.

Relevant Pages