Re: Earl of Spencer
- From: "Michael Rhodes" <migx73allenford2002@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Oct 2005 17:06:15 -0700
Stephen Stillwell / Tom Wilding wrote:
> "Michael Rhodes" <migx73allenford2002@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1128468916.437088.54920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > BettyG wrote:
> >> If the current Earl of Spencer didn't have his heir and a spare, whom
> >> would the title pass to when he passed?
> >
> > The peerage would probably have fallen into extinction, because the
> > only other male Spencer is a kinsman, George Cecil Robert Maurice
> > Spencer, born in 1932, who aint married.
> >
> > ***
> >
> BTW - it is not the Earl of Spencer, but simply the Earl Spencer. The
> earldoms that use the family name rather than a geographic designation do
> not use the "of."
>
> -- Stephen J Stillwell, jr
I wonder why Marquess Camden is so titled when he's actually a Pratt.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Earl of Spencer
- From: Gillian White
- Re: Earl of Spencer
- References:
- Earl of Spencer
- From: BettyG
- Re: Earl of Spencer
- From: Michael Rhodes
- Re: Earl of Spencer
- From: Stephen Stillwell / Tom Wilding
- Earl of Spencer
- Prev by Date: Aristocratic births, September, 2005
- Next by Date: Re: Earl of Spencer
- Previous by thread: Re: Earl of Spencer
- Next by thread: Re: Earl of Spencer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|