Re: Canada's Constitutional Queen




Stephen Jenuth (jenuths@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
> Stephen Jenuth wrote:
>
>> michael r james wrote:
>>
>>> (3) Section 2, repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57
>>> Vict., c. 14 (U.K.), read as follows:
>>>
>>> 2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen
>>> extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens
>>> of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. "
>>>
>>> Since these acts refer to those successors who are 'kings' one might
>>> have a clue they would infer 'his majesty' as well if such were the case
>>> that we had a male sovereign.
>>>
>>> Now I would suggest that all those who cannot understand that, send a
>>> bottle of 'whiteout' with a note to the Prime Minister requesting him to
>>> change everycopy of the BNA act and the Constitution act that exist
>>> since you can't understand simple concepts of the language. Im sure he
>>> will reply to your requests with gratitude and some suggestions of his
>>> own.
>>
>> Back in the 1880s, government was getting a bit more complicated. And the
>> whiteout solution did not seem like a good idea.
>>
>> Instead, the Interpretation Act, 1889 was passed. The current
>> Interpretation Act, 1978 has the following provision:
>>
>> 10. In any Act a reference to the Sovereign reigning at the time of the
>> passing of the Act is to be construed, unless the contrary intention
>> appears, as a reference to the Sovereign for the time being.
>>
>> My betting is that the 1889 one has something similar in it. And thus,
>> when cleaning up their statutes, the British Parliament removed the
>> superfluous provision from the BNA Act in 1893.
>>
>
> And finally having found a copy of the Interpretation Act, 1889, I turned
> out to be right. Here is section 30.
>
> References to the Crown.
>
> 30. In this Act and in every other Act, whether passed before or after the
> commencement of this Act, references to the Sovereign reigning at the time
> of the passing of the Act or to the Crown shall, unless the contrary
> intention appears, be construed as references to the Sovereign for the time
> being, and this Act shall be binding on the Crown.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Stephen Jenuth
> (jenuths@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
*
Thanks. Now, all we have to worry about is whether the UK
Parliament, when enacting Section 9. of the then BNA Act, 1867,
REALLY intended it to refer only to Queen Victoria. The contrary
intention appeared, of course, in Section 2. of said Act. But
said Section was repealed, so one is left with this last doubt
about the omission of the expression "Heirs and Successors" in
the Interpretation Act, 1889 (U.K.).
*
Have a nice day, ye all!
*
--
*** cj559@xxxxxx ** cj559@xxxxxx ***
C L A U D E L A T R E M O U I L L E
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Computer Misuse Act
    ... Looking at the Act, I can only spot the following: ... "17 References to any program or data held in a computer include references to any program or data held in any removable storage medium which is for the time being in the computer; and a computer is to be regarded as containing any program or data held in any such medium." ... So a router could then qualify. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: OT: PZ may be a man of his word per Washington Times interview
    ... So much snipping and loss of references follows. ... A prestigious publishing house with the support of rabid pro-Darwin group and a strong commitment from their employees makes a massive printing of cheap copies of OtOoS to be given away to students and people interested in biology with the expectation that they will read it immediately. ... That is done to highlight the ridiculous, over-the-top, insane response to the act, not to justify the act. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Canadas Constitutional Queen
    ... The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen ... In any Act a reference to the Sovereign reigning at the time of the ... > superfluous provision from the BNA Act in 1893. ... References to the Crown. ...
    (alt.talk.royalty)
  • Re: Bailiffs - Unpaid Parking Fine
    ... Alex Heney wrote: ... I haven't seen any quotes of the Act by you, only references to it. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: House of Lords rejects equality of succession to the throne
    ... >>> Canada that no Act of the UK Parliament can change the law of either. ... >> Zealand.), makes explicit provision with regard to succession. ... >> The Governor-General appointed by the Sovereign is the Sovereign's ... >> Every power conferred on the Governor-General by or under any Act ...
    (alt.talk.royalty)