Re: I may be crazy

"David Cameron Staples" <staples@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:iuqkkl$t62$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 21:23:21 +0200, Maarten Wiltink wrote:
"David Cameron Staples" <staples@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:iuol6j$s6q$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[...] it's possible to be a doofus without being in any way disabled.

How do you define 'disabled', exactly?

Ask four people, get six opinions.

"With an acquired or congenital condition which results in disadvantages,
and some activities being made difficult or impossible, compared to
people who don't have that condition" is as concise as I can think of
right now. The above line was meant to describe how someone can be
almost as socially clumsy as an autistic person, but without actually
being autistic.

Oh right, without being _autistic_.

Because there are no crippling effects from being socially clumsy, and
people who are are just not trying hard enough, right? Or perhaps they
aren't team players.

Tebrgwrf,
Maarten Wiltink


.