Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Lionel <imagenoir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:38:10 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:30:17 -0400, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
In <slrnivi87o.89.zebeej@xxxxxxxxx>, on 06/15/2011
at 09:15 PM, Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@xxxxxxxxx> said:
The amount of cognitive dissonance literalists have to manage is
massive...
I'm waiting for them to accept a literal reading of Song of Songs.
Ought to be interesting if they include the bit about her moving her
bowels[0] for him. At best, it'd be scat pr0n. At worst, well, let's not
go there.
[0] Yes, I know, but it is the usual translation, as well as being the
funniest.
--
W
. | , w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
.
- References:
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers. (Was Re: I may be crazy)
- From: Peter Corlett
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers. (Was Re: I may be crazy)
- From: John Burnham
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers. (Was Re: I may be crazy)
- From: Brian Kantor
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Steve VanDevender
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Steve VanDevender
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Zebee Johnstone
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers. (Was Re: I may be crazy)
- Prev by Date: Re: Assumptions in questions/answers. (Was Re: I may be crazy)
- Next by Date: Re: I may be crazy
- Previous by thread: Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- Next by thread: Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|