Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:30:17 -0400
In <slrnivi87o.89.zebeej@xxxxxxxxx>, on 06/15/2011
at 09:15 PM, Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@xxxxxxxxx> said:
The amount of cognitive dissonance literalists have to manage is
massive...
I'm waiting for them to accept a literal reading of Song of Songs.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> ISO position
Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+bspfh to contact me.
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: mikea
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Lionel
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- References:
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers. (Was Re: I may be crazy)
- From: Peter Corlett
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers. (Was Re: I may be crazy)
- From: John Burnham
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers. (Was Re: I may be crazy)
- From: Brian Kantor
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Steve VanDevender
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Steve VanDevender
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- From: Zebee Johnstone
- Re: Assumptions in questions/answers. (Was Re: I may be crazy)
- Prev by Date: Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- Next by Date: So who's closest?
- Previous by thread: Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- Next by thread: Re: Assumptions in questions/answers.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|