Re: I may be crazy
- From: wollman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Garrett Wollman)
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:47:14 +0000 (UTC)
In article <_T4Ip.144$GY.30@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<abuse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't know what sort of software they have in your universe,
but if my supermarket (e.g.) advertises "two for $5" on a $2.65
item and I take one to self-checkout, I usually get to pay $2.50.
In my state, "two for $5" is defined by law to mean "$2.50 each",
regardless of how many you buy. On the other hand, there's a liquid I
buy regularly that is advertised as "10 for $10" but actually costs
$1.05 each.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wollman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I may be crazy
- From: SteveD
- Re: I may be crazy
- From: Brian Kantor
- Re: I may be crazy
- References:
- Re: I may be crazy
- From: Julian Macassey
- Re: I may be crazy
- From: Peter H. Coffin
- Re: I may be crazy
- From: abuse
- Re: I may be crazy
- Prev by Date: Re: I may be crazy
- Next by Date: Re: I may be crazy
- Previous by thread: Re: I may be crazy
- Next by thread: Re: I may be crazy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|