Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Lionel <imagenoir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 03:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:33:43 +0000, Peter Corlett wrote:
Lionel <imagenoir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:59:32 +0200, Maarten Wiltink wrote:[...]
But then, I'm not _that_ old as people go here.If you have a copy of GEM, you might be - or at least you'd be able to
fake it.
Age is but a state of mind. One of our brethren lovingly maintains a GEM
archive, and he's not even spent thirty years on this planet yet.
<ponders> I think my copy landed in dev/null about the time he was
probably discovering PeeCees.
(Of course, many of us were born middle-aged.)
Sadly, I maintained my ethical virginity until long after it'd ceased to
have any practical value.
--
W
. | , w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
.
- References:
- Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Kenneth Brody
- Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Lionel
- Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Peter Corlett
- Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- Prev by Date: Re: I may be crazy
- Next by Date: Re: I may be crazy
- Previous by thread: Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- Next by thread: Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
