Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Lionel <imagenoir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:21:10 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:59:32 +0200, Maarten Wiltink wrote:
"Kenneth Brody" <kenbrody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EZydneHvyPdFY3XQnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 6/3/2011 12:27 AM, Lionel wrote:
[...]
You'd be amazed at the amount of stuff that people think is worthy of
preservation in a museum.
I think I still have those Windows 1.0 Beta floppies in a box
somewhere.
(Smiley snipped for obvious reasons)
There must have been several betas then, because the Windows 1.0 release
I have lying around somewhere (in ARJ form on a file server) would fit
on a single floppy of every capacity I've ever encountered.
But then, I'm not _that_ old as people go here.
If you have a copy of GEM, you might be - or at least you'd be able to
fake it.
--
W
. | , w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Peter Corlett
- Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- References:
- Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Julian Macassey
- Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Lionel
- Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- From: Kenneth Brody
- Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- Prev by Date: Re: I may be crazy
- Next by Date: Re: I may be crazy
- Previous by thread: Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- Next by thread: Re: Postmortem disposition of technomemorabilia?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|