Re: Google 'I' for Idiots
- From: Lionel <imagenoir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:21:30 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:53:07 +0000, Chris wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:15:08 -0400, Kenneth Brody wrote:
On 3/21/2011 12:19 PM, Brian Kantor wrote: [...]
I find it amusing. My stock reply is "you mean, after retirement" and[...]
I almost never hear from them again. It's not like typing my name
into 10e100 wouldn't provide some sort of clue... '"brian kantor"
ucsd' yields 4,760 hits as of this morning, not all of which I'm proud
of.
ITYM "1.0e100"
:-)
Surely that would just be 1?
I think you are fundamentally misunderstanding exponents.
--
W
. | , w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Google 'I' for Idiots
- From: Chris
- Re: Google 'I' for Idiots
- References:
- Re: Google 'I' for Idiots
- From: Brian Kantor
- Re: Google 'I' for Idiots
- From: Kenneth Brody
- Re: Google 'I' for Idiots
- From: Chris
- Re: Google 'I' for Idiots
- Prev by Date: Re: Pacific unrecovery
- Next by Date: Re: Pacific unrecovery
- Previous by thread: Re: Google 'I' for Idiots
- Next by thread: Re: Google 'I' for Idiots
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
