Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: "Maarten Wiltink" <maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:48:22 +0100
"Lionel" <imagenoir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ik4llk$mc0$18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<on caffeine>
[...] It's not as is there aren't any non-pharmacologically active
flavouring agents.
I have for some time now been fascinated by food additive E175. It's
a colouring agent though, not a flavouring agent - chemically, it could
never be. It's not the stuff itself that holds my attention but the
sheer chutzpah of putting it in food for people to eat. Keep it up for
long enough and you will find people sieving your cesspool.
Tebrgwrf,
Maarten Wiltink
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Alan J Rosenthal
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- References:
- Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: David Skinner
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Alan J Rosenthal
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Paul
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Alan J Rosenthal
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Lionel
- Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Prev by Date: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Next by Date: Re: Meetings are for what?
- Previous by thread: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Next by thread: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Index(es):