Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: flaps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan J Rosenthal)
- Date: 24 Feb 2011 03:26:59 GMT
Joe Thompson <spam+@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I am given to understand that in both Canada and Australia this is the
result of stricter food-and-drug laws than in the US. In the US, Jolt
Cola, Mountain Dew, and in fact pretty much all caffeinated soft drinks
escape FDA regulation as a drug by claiming the caffeine is a flavoring
agent,
I prefer the truth version. I can see two plausible reasons for adding
caffeine: to make the beverage useable for stimulation / waking up, or
to make it addictive. The flavouring explanation does not hold water and
should not be a basis of lawmaking.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Lionel
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- References:
- Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: David Skinner
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Alan J Rosenthal
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Paul
- Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Prev by Date: Re: Meetings are for what?
- Next by Date: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Previous by thread: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Next by thread: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|