Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Lionel <imagenoir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:56:27 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:01:34 -0800, Steve VanDevender wrote:
[...]
Whether or not the occupant can leave his wheelchair at will, I still
object to the phrase "bound to a wheelchair" on the basis that a
wheelchair should be thought of as a tool to enhance mobility and
freedom, not a place of confinement. Most of my ire is directed at
American journalists who still use "bound to a wheelchair" or "confined
to a wheelchair" as a standard rote phrase to describe any wheelchair
user, no matter what their level of ability. Even if you were just
trying to use it figuratively, "bound to a wheelchair" carries strong
negative connotations. I'm well past tired of seeing the phrase and
would much rather that people avoid promoting negative views of
disability.
Speaking of anti-ableism, I saw an extremely pertinent website yesterday:
<rummages>
<http://cripwheels.blogspot.com/>
(Caution: Some pages may be NSFW)
--
W
. | , w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
.
- References:
- Meetings are for what?
- From: Cipher
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Cipher
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Brian Kantor
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Seebs
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Cipher
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Cipher
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Maarten Wiltink
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Steve VanDevender
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Maarten Wiltink
- Re: Meetings are for what?
- From: Steve VanDevender
- Meetings are for what?
- Prev by Date: Re: Meetings are for what?
- Next by Date: Re: Meetings are for what?
- Previous by thread: Re: Meetings are for what?
- Next by thread: Re: Meetings are for what?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|