Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Lionel <imagenoir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:27:29 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:22:50 +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
Joe Thompson <spam+@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:---
I am given to understand that in both Canada and Australia this is the
result of stricter food-and-drug laws than in the US. In the US, Jolt
Cola, Mountain Dew, and in fact pretty much all caffeinated soft drinks
escape FDA regulation as a drug by claiming the caffeine is a flavoring
agent, whereas in other countries like .au and .ca they either face
regulation or have to be sold without added caffeine. -- Joe
Mountain Dew isn't brown enough to be allowed caffeine.
http://www.ifsqn.com/forum/index.php/topic/8026-caffeine-law/
Caffeine is strictly regulated under the Food and Drug Regulations. It is
approved as a miscellaneous food additive under Table VIII, Division 16,
and it is only permitted to be added to "cola-type beverages" up to 200
ppm in the final product.
---
Gosh, I wonder which multinational corporation the Canadian government
didn't want to piss off?
--
W
. | , w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
.
- References:
- Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Alan J Rosenthal
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Paul
- Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- From: Tony Finch
- Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Prev by Date: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Next by Date: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Previous by thread: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Next by thread: Re: Truth in "truth in labelling" laws
- Index(es):