Re: Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- From: Brian Kantor <brian@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Oct 2010 16:08:34 GMT
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
While I am forced to use that fetid heap of programming errors, I fail
to see what it is in the computer's architecture that attracts it.
It is that the computer's architecture fails to prevent it.
I modestly offer my corollary to Murphy's law:
If Word can be run on it, Word *will* be run on it.
- Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- From: Maarten Wiltink
- Re: Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- References:
- Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- From: Seebs
- Re: Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- From: Niklas Karlsson
- Re: Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- From: Seymour J.
- Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- Prev by Date: Re: Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- Next by Date: Re: Retarded marketing email 'requires' Bhgybbx Rkcerff
- Previous by thread: Re: Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- Next by thread: Re: Security in the high-tech world of the modern pharmacy
- Index(es):