Re: Go ahead. Ask.
- From: Seebs <usenet-nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Jun 2010 17:04:48 GMT
On 2010-06-12, abuse@xxxxxxxxx <abuse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You know that your compiler fully and correctly implements ieee's
-0.0 hanlding? E.g. that 0 == -0.0 evaluates to true?
By amazing coincidence, I actually do happen to know that it implements
that *particular* feature, because a while back I got roped into chasing
down a few boundary case conditions in its floating point exception
handling, which included running some IEEE floating point conformance
tests. :)
-s
--
Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
.
- References:
- Go ahead. Ask.
- From: Seebs
- Re: Go ahead. Ask.
- From: Kenneth Brody
- Re: Go ahead. Ask.
- From: Seebs
- Re: Go ahead. Ask.
- From: Jed Davis
- Re: Go ahead. Ask.
- From: Seebs
- Re: Go ahead. Ask.
- From: abuse
- Go ahead. Ask.
- Prev by Date: Re: Go ahead. Ask.
- Next by Date: Re: Would I be whining if...
- Previous by thread: Re: Go ahead. Ask.
- Next by thread: Re: Go ahead. Ask.
- Index(es):