Re: Well, *that* was unexpected

Dan Birchall <feeping.creature@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michel) wrote:
Raid bloody 0. Whoever thought *that* was a good idea...

The lower the number the better, right? A sign manglement plays too much
golf.

I'm now comparing, in my head, the pros and cons of RAID -1 versus
RAID UNDEF.

"No, you have to make sure at least one disk has failed before you
migrate the data. Make sure all sets are made of a non-prime
number of disks, or we risk data gain!"

--
Gene Sullivan :: curiousgene@xxxxxxxxx :: http://curiousgene.com
If my son wants to be a pimp when he grows up, that's fine with me. I
hope he's a good one and enjoys it and doesn't get caught. I'll support
him in this. But if he wants to be a network administrator, he's out of
the house and not part of my family. --Steve Wozniak
.

Quantcast