Re: Microsoft strikes back
- From: Dave Hughes <spambait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Oct 2008 02:49:48 GMT
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:50:28 +0000, Matt Palmer wrote:
Hence why it didn't happen. Nccyr place form at an absolute premium
over function, which is a big part of the reason why I'm never going to
be getting one.
I figure a T4 vObbx is now sufficiently old that this shouldn't be UI,
but my main reason was battery life - roughly double a comparable x86
lapdog at the time. I was willing to accept the difficulty of upgrades in
return for that.
These days it's much of a muchness, since everything's x86. But
apparently Nccyr have made it considerably easier to get to the HDD in
the newer models, so I'll probably drink the Kool-Aid when it comes time
to replace this one.
--
Dave Hughes - dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There are some things so serious you have to laugh at them.
- Niels Bohr
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Microsoft strikes back
- From: Graham Reed
- Re: Microsoft strikes back
- References:
- Re: Microsoft strikes back
- From: Jasper Janssen
- Re: Microsoft strikes back
- From: Chris Suslowicz
- Re: Microsoft strikes back
- From: Dave Hughes
- Re: Microsoft strikes back
- From: Matt Palmer
- Re: Microsoft strikes back
- Prev by Date: Re: Vendors that suck
- Next by Date: Re: Vendors that suck
- Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft strikes back
- Next by thread: Re: Microsoft strikes back
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|