Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: John Burnham <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:32:05 +0100
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:25:25 +0000, Roger Burton West wrote:
John Burnham wrote:
Of course, I prefer a reasoned argument[...]
Hey, it might even persuade me to rethink my position.
Is that called "flip-flopper" or "heretic" this year? I lose track.
I prefer "not so bloody arrogant that he thinks he's always right despite
having been exposed to evidence to the contrary", but then I would,
wouldn't I ?
J
.
- References:
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Richard Bos
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: John Burnham
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Steve VanDevender
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: John Burnham
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Prev by Date: Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Next by Date: Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Previous by thread: Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Next by thread: Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Index(es):