Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Tai <tai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 01:32:47 +0000 (UTC)
While pretending to be roadkill on the InfoBahn, <zebeej@xxxxxxxxx> scrawled:
Which is mostly a fact that the lusers didn't read the documentation,
or when they did the doco was inadequate and so they tried a manual
from the religion down the road cos the bods who were using that
religion seemed to think it did the same job.
So, not only are the angels crying because they couldn't update
the "thing", now they're crying because the lusers are using someone
else's manual?! I want to see that worked into the original quote! :)
-Tai
--
http://www.vcnet.com/bms/features/serendipities.html
http://www.kenthamilton.net/humor/humor.html
http://www.despair.com/demotivators/cluelessness.html
"What we have done with PCs so far is not natural" - Craig Mundie, CTO Microsoft
.
- References:
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Tai
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Robert Uhl
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Tai
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Just zis Guy, you know?
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Tai
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Phil Launchbury
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Tony Quinn
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Phil Launchbury
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Tony Quinn
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Phil Launchbury
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Tai
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: crn
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Richard Bos
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: David Cameron Staples
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- From: Zebee Johnstone
- Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Prev by Date: Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Next by Date: Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Previous by thread: Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Next by thread: Re: I have been CHALLENGED. . .
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|