Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- From: Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 May 2008 20:52:26 GMT
In alt.sysadmin.recovery on Sat, 24 May 2008 16:39:38 -0400
Howard S Shubs <howard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <g19s77$fbt$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, sethb@xxxxxxxxx (Seth)
wrote:
And how do you know, anyway?
The person made images available. Also, they said as much on the Howard
Stern show.
You said "My position is simple: you are the sex you have. That person
has the primary sexual characteristics of a female, so they're female.
I don't care about the rest. Find it hostile if you wish, I don't care. "
So now you deny you are talking about the general.
You don't know what my genitalia are you've never seen them. Many
people interacting with me on the internet get the configuration
wrong. You seem to know what it is without seeing it but when called
you back off. We know what that sort of thing's called.
Zebee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- From: Howard S Shubs
- Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- References:
- Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- From: Howard S Shubs
- Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- From: Alan J Rosenthal
- Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- From: Howard S Shubs
- Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- From: Seth
- Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- From: Howard S Shubs
- Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- Prev by Date: Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- Next by Date: Re: ZFS, from hell's heart I stab at thee!
- Previous by thread: Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- Next by thread: Re: Scottish, uhm... uuh... what should we call this?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|