Re: Catching a bite
- From: chris+news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Chris Suslowicz)
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:43:11 +0100
In article <ft3l0a$j44$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Anthony de Boer - USEnet) wrote:
Peter Corlett posted thus:
Ross J. Reedstrom <reedstrm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[0] a mouth full of 37½C confluent E. coli culture (in rich broth)
was a shock, but not as bad as you might imagine. I've had worse "instant
soup"
What's the actual difference between the two? The serving temperature?
Zbfg znxref bs vafgnag fbhc ner jbexvat haqre gbb gvtug n ohqtrg gb
ernyyl qb whfgvpr gb gur pbaprcg bs perngvat flagurgvp qvneeurn.
I should also point out that one of the suppliers of culture medium
in .uk was a company named "Oebbxr Obaq/Bkbvq". I suspect they are
still in the business.
Chris.
--
The strength of the antispammer movement is that there is no organization.
Nobody can make deals, nobody has the authority to surrender. All people
with pretensions of "leadership" do is make it look like a small bunch
of people with no life. It's a *big* bunch of people with no life.
- Paul Vader in news.admin.net-abuse.email
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Catching a bite
- From: Garrett Wollman
- Re: Catching a bite
- References:
- Re: Catching a bite
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: Catching a bite
- From: Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: Catching a bite
- From: Peter Corlett
- Re: Catching a bite
- Prev by Date: Re: Catching a bite
- Next by Date: Re: Catching a bite
- Previous by thread: Re: Catching a bite
- Next by thread: Re: Catching a bite
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|