Re: To The University Types
- From: crn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 19:52:08 +0000 (UTC)
Mike Andrews <mikea@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Being so small it was unable to carry enough fuel for anything other than
the transatlantic hop, a larger version could have been used on more
profitable routes such as London-Johannesburg.
I'm reasonably sure that would not have been possible, as they were close
to the limit of (air resistance/engine thrust = maximum speed) and (range
= (available fuel)/(cargo weight & space in the aircraft)).
The computations certainly lead to a desire for much more energetic
fuels and engines capable of handling them.
What proportion of the SR71 is fuel tankage?
About 110%, judging by the published -1 manual.
This is a rather unfair comparison, the SR22 flies around twice as fast
and rather higher than Concorde. A more reasonable comparison would be
From the quill of Chris Newport g4jci.