Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.

TimC caught my attention on Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:29:08 +1000 by saying:

On 2007-08-17, Kyle James Cardoza (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
Mike Looney caught my attention on Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:15:20 +0000 by
saying:
No, at the same time. Like I said, a bit complex.

Polyfidelous relationships are a favourite topic of mine. They're aware of
each other, as you said; are they also in a relationship with each other?
The one and only polyfidelous relationship I've been involved in was
like that. I've a few polyfolk friends, and a couple of same on my forum,
so none of this seems overly complex to me. Just interesting.

Any way you shake it, the more people in a relationship, the more, erm,
interesting it can get, from an anthropological point of view.

Damn it! Will you guys leave someone for people like me?


I think maybe a review of polyamoury is in order. In general (not
necessarily specific to the above relationship!) poly relationships, in my
experience, are at least open to the *possibility* of there being room for
one more.

Or do you mean that people "like you" (what does that mean, by the way?)
wouldn't be willing to participate in a poly relationship?

--
Faith does not, in fact, move mountains; it can't even cure diarrhea, or
clear up acne. It certainly won't protect anyone from his own stupidity.
.