Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- From: "Mike Andrews" <mikea@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:24:28 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:02:30 -0300,
"Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<46a94426$44$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
In <f85kqv$5gv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 07/24/2007
at 07:44 PM, "Mike Andrews" <mikea@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Excellent choice! I think that "Vasa" and "Mary Rose" should be in
there, too.
Vasa? I thought that old Gus won a battle or two before he wandered
out into the fog. Or were you referring to a different Vasa?
The ship, not the king. The king done _good_, the ship turned turtle
after sailing about a mile on her maiden voyage. Naval architecture
was not a well-developed science, and things like "metacenter" and
"center of buoyancy" were poorly understood.
--
If you can modify it via software, then it doesn't count as hardware.
-- Lionel, in the MonasterY
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- From: Jasper Janssen
- Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- From: David Cameron Staples
- Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- References:
- Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- From: Jim Richardson
- Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- From: Jim Richardson
- Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- From: Mike Andrews
- Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- From: Peter H. Coffin
- Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- From: Steve VanDevender
- Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
- Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- Prev by Date: Re: Aviation, Korean style...
- Next by Date: Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- Previous by thread: Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- Next by thread: Re: Failover succeeds, again, and again, and again.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
