Re: secondhand angst
- From: Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Jun 2007 00:22:09 GMT
In alt.sysadmin.recovery on Thu, 31 May 2007 21:24:08 GMT
Jamie Riden <jamie.riden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
In alt.sysadmin.recovery on Wed, 30 May 2007 22:36:50 -0300
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They may be right about the last, but they need to understand that the
most important sexual organ is the brain. An affectionate, bright,
educated young lady can be far more erotically arousing than a
bubblehead who has nothing going for her but a face and a figure.
YMMV.
SO they say, but for some reason the blokes always imagine the bright
one *also* has the looks.
No offence, but your sample is probably mainly composed of
Australians.
Of course. So you are sure men from other countries don't hold such a
belief?
So when looking, the eyes still slide over the bright one.
You've won this by default, because no-one here is going to come out
and say "well, my gf is very bright, but looks like a bit frumpy and
that's the way I like it".
WHy not? If they are sure it is so, they can also be sure their
partner's aware of it.
Zebee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: secondhand angst
- From: Tai
- Re: secondhand angst
- From: Olivier Galibert
- Re: secondhand angst
- Prev by Date: Re: The destruction of our technological heritage.
- Next by Date: Re: The problem is not the computers.
- Previous by thread: Re: secondhand angst
- Next by thread: Re: secondhand angst
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|