Re: The problem is not the computers.
- From: Geoff Kinnel <Geoff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:25:44 -0500
In article <20070530223334.2ef21834@h3st>, Emil Snorre wrote:
* Roger Burton West <roger+asr200705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
uggc://pbzzhavgl.yvirwbheany.pbz/grpufhccbeg/1368038.ugzy
Yes, but how long will the facilities manager be roasted over a hot Sun
for not securing his desk...?
There's a followup:
uggc://pbzzhavgl.yvirwbheany.pbz/grpufhccbeg/1369103.ugzy
Schadenfreude defined.
gk
--
This space intentionally left.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The problem is not the computers.
- From: Joe Bednorz
- Re: The problem is not the computers.
- References:
- Re: The problem is not the computers.
- From: Emil Snorre
- Re: The problem is not the computers.
- Prev by Date: Re: Should'a gotten a light cycle
- Next by Date: Re: secondhand angst
- Previous by thread: Re: The problem is not the computers.
- Next by thread: Re: The problem is not the computers.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
