Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: Jim <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:19:36 +0000
In article <erv189$4qh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Burnham wrote:
Jim wrote:
October?!
As in, *last* October or the one that's several months away?
The one that's about 7 months away. That's for the next main Discworld
book. I did hear rumours of another Tiffany Aching book which might
appear before then but I can't confirm that.
I do believe that Mr Pratchett did claim he was going to slow down the
book production, so that might explain the long wait until the next book.
<wibble>
Jim
--
Find me at http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk
Please help to bring two classic works of whisky literature back into print
by visiting http://www.ClassicExpressions.co.uk Thank you.
"The deil's awa, the deil's awa, the deil's awa wi' th' Exciseman."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: Chris Suslowicz
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- References:
- reading is not always recovery
- From: David P. Murphy
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: David Cameron Staples
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: Peter Corlett
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: Peter Corlett
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: Michel Buijsman
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: Jim
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: Dave
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: Jim
- Re: reading is not always recovery
- From: John Burnham
- reading is not always recovery
- Prev by Date: Re: reading is not always recovery
- Next by Date: Re: reading is not always recovery
- Previous by thread: Re: reading is not always recovery
- Next by thread: Re: reading is not always recovery
- Index(es):