Re: bowling for cars
- From: "Dave" <spambait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Feb 2007 10:14:03 GMT
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:58:43 +1100, TimC wrote:
Go on, name a machine more efficient at locomotion than the bicycle.
Apollo? Actually even with the Saturn V launcher the distance travelled
might be sufficient to get a half decent energy:distance ratio.
Erm. 3 guys, 1.8 million km or thereabouts, 2 million kg of fuel +
oxidiser. Nope, still going to be worse than a car, even though they could
take the HOV lane. I'll go back to the straight Apollo.
--
Dave Hughes | dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mr Tulip's vices were also limitless, but he owned up to cheap
aftershave because a man has to drink *something* -- Terry Pratchett
.
- References:
- Re: bowling for cars
- From: Alan J. Wylie
- Re: bowling for cars
- From: TimC
- Re: bowling for cars
- From: Peter Corlett
- Re: bowling for cars
- From: mroberds
- Re: bowling for cars
- From: mroberds
- Re: bowling for cars
- From: John Pitts
- Re: bowling for cars
- From: TimC
- Re: bowling for cars
- Prev by Date: Re: Recovery, just not the normal sort
- Next by Date: Re: Recovery, just not the normal sort
- Previous by thread: Re: bowling for cars
- Next by thread: Re: bowling for cars
- Index(es):