Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 07:35:26 -0500
In <hdm0s2h6fusev4m32v13iuffobtrfu6hia@xxxxxxx>, on 01/31/2007
at 06:27 PM, Rob Adams <robadams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Is 'modulated electromagnetic waves' considered speech, or a form of
emr that you are licesnsed to create and propagate?
If it's speech then prohibiting me from broadcasting on the frequency
of my choice is a violation of the First Amendment. The very existence
of the broadcast industry depends on a monopoly imposed by the
government, so I'm not too impressed by 1st Amendment arguments by the
station. Now, 1st Amendment arguments from people asking for access to
the stations is another matter.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> ISO position
Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+bspfh to contact me.
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Recovery through Photography
- Next by Date: Re: alt.sysadmin.recovery FAQ v1.799999999999999998...
- Previous by thread: Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- Next by thread: Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- Index(es):