Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- From: "Mike Andrews" <mikea@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:54:46 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:35:33 +0000 (UTC), Brian Kantor <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in <ep69kl$ari$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Mike Andrews <mikea@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jewell's a "hearing-ear dog", and not ...
Around here, the signs say "No pets. Assistive animals allowed."
As though they had a choice.
Holy Euphemism, Batman!
Here it's "Service animals", which actually is a smaller and more
restrictive category than "assistive animals". You can get away with
exclugding an assistive animal which isn't a service animal; psych-
support critters are in the larger category, but aren't service
critters under the ADA.
--
ALL CAPS TALK LEADS TO B1FF T4LK. B1FF T4LK LE4D$ 2 W4r37_t4LK.
W4r3Zt/\1k L34d$ 2 31337 \/\//\r37_ |>0o|) 7/\|_|<,
4|\||) 7|?3|23 7!?3 |)/\|2|( 51|)3 |_13$ -- CCooke, in the Monastery, 2001
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- From: Chris Suslowicz
- Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- References:
- <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- From: Mike Andrews
- Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- From: Mike Andrews
- Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- From: Robert Uhl
- Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- From: Mike Andrews
- <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- Prev by Date: Re: Recovery through Photography
- Next by Date: Re: It figures (or, Welcome home, Prodigal!)
- Previous by thread: Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- Next by thread: Re: <tap><tap><tap> Is this thing on???
- Index(es):