Re: Recovery from ancient hardware.
- From: ptomblin+netnews@xxxxxxxxx (Paul Tomblin)
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:49:21 +0000 (UTC)
In a previous article, SteveD <usenet@xxxxxxxx> said:
On 30 Nov 2006 22:00:55 -0500, Omri Schwarz <ocscwar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
So really, you don't want too many of them built, and the smith who made
it can be assigned many other projects when he is done with this one.
Never has "assigned [to] other projects" sounded so ominous.
"You'll have an important role in our long term strategy. We need you for
a vital part of the manufacture of Damascus steel swords. Or rather, one
particular sword."
(Isn't it Damascus steel that folklore had it that it was quenched by
plunging into the body of a slave?)
--
Paul Tomblin <ptomblin@xxxxxxxxx> http://blog.xcski.com/
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recovery from ancient hardware.
- From: Richard Bos
- Re: Recovery from ancient hardware.
- From: Chris Suslowicz
- Re: Recovery from ancient hardware.
- References:
- Recovery from ancient hardware.
- From: Omri Schwarz
- Re: Recovery from ancient hardware.
- From: Omri Schwarz
- Re: Recovery from ancient hardware.
- From: SteveD
- Recovery from ancient hardware.
- Prev by Date: Re: Fish in a barrel
- Next by Date: Re: Recovery from ancient hardware.
- Previous by thread: Re: Recovery from ancient hardware.
- Next by thread: Re: Recovery from ancient hardware.
- Index(es):