Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- From: Jasper Janssen <jasper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:57:18 GMT
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:49:08 GMT, John Hardin <jhardin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry, I was speaking in generalities - one of the arguments against CSS
being an effective anti-piracy measure is that the volume piratesy don't
bother decrypting, they just bitwise copy.
They may have done so before DeCSS came out, but that's been, what, 6, 7
years now? And less than a year before it was widely known and integrated
into $many software products to make it easy to use?
Jasper
.
- References:
- Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- From: Jasper Janssen
- Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- From: Alan J Rosenthal
- Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- From: Jasper Janssen
- Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- From: John Hardin
- Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- From: Jasper Janssen
- Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- From: John Hardin
- Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- Prev by Date: Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- Next by Date: Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- Previous by thread: Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- Next by thread: Re: Recovery by Relocation.
- Index(es):