Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: chris+news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Chris Suslowicz)
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:23:33 +0100
In article <e2u1ct$b1t$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
dpm_usenet@xxxxxxxxx (David P. Murphy) wrote:
Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How recent is recent? My '37 Fowler says it is "now common".
1737?
No: 37 Nominal Horse Power, she asked a traction engine.
Chris.
--
Fusion bombs have fission bombs installed there to ignite 'em,
And fission bombs have lesser bombs and so ad infinitum.
And fusion bombs themselves inflate the budgets that they grow on;
These budgets then grow greater still, and greater still, and so on.
.
- References:
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: Chris Suslowicz
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: Joe Zeff
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: Chris Suslowicz
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: Joe Bednorz
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: David Cameron Staples
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: Mike Andrews
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: Dave Brown
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: Robert Uhl
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: Zebee Johnstone
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- From: David P. Murphy
- Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- Prev by Date: Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- Next by Date: Re: it's not a real product, but I still want it
- Previous by thread: Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- Next by thread: Re: Stimpy, what were you thinking?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|