Re: Delurk, initial report
- From: TimC <tconnors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:32:41 GMT
On 2006-01-16, Anthony de Boer - USEnet (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> Peter Corlett posted thus:
>>This sounds like an interesting idea, but there is possibly one snag.
>>What does "lunch break" mean?
>
> SWMBO cuts each sandwich in half; that's presumably the lunch break.
>
> I've never seen the need to precut sandwiches; I have perfectly good
> teeth.
Waaah! I've had problems eating lunch in particular (I like big beefy
rolls. Sometimes filled with beef) ever since the accident -- the
tooth was fractured clean from the jaw below the gum afterall.
And now the dentist tells me it looks like it won't be repairing
itself -- it it not getting much less painful after 3... 4? months.
Good thing the government will be paying for the $5000 repair (pity it
isn't the SUV driver). Bad thing I'm going to lose my favourite tooth
(any tooth designed to rip into meat is a good tooth in my books).
--
TimC
E = MC ** 2 +- 3db
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delurk, initial report
- From: David P. Murphy
- Re: Delurk, initial report
- References:
- Delurk, initial report
- From: Jason McKinney
- Re: Delurk, initial report
- From: Bryce Utting
- Re: Delurk, initial report
- From: Peter Corlett
- Delurk, initial report
- Prev by Date: Re: It can be done, and I have done it
- Next by Date: Re: It can be done, and I have done it
- Previous by thread: Re: Delurk, initial report
- Next by thread: Re: Delurk, initial report
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|