Re: I want my Saturday back

Robert Sneddon <nojay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In message <439d5eb0$0$23295$db0fefd9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter
> <abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>
> >SATA is making inroads on the low-end SCSI market. Just you wait until
> >you discover some of the ways that *that* can suck hard.
>
> At least in the case of SATA they fail one at a time and not in stringy
> bunches. They also don't require expending a goat to install (which
> could put Jim out of business...)

<satellite delay> Hey! Look, I would like to point out that there is *no
proof whatsoever* that I have *anything* to do with goats (beyond SCSI
voodoo, obviously). It's all just rumour, conjecture and thingy.
Wossname. Hearsay.

Jim
--
Find me at http://www.ursaminorbeta.co.uk
"There's no 'I' in team, but there is a 'me' if you jumble the letters
up a bit." - Dr. House.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Should I set new drive as active?
    ... Michael Ortega ... >> Are you going to 'move' your system files to the new drive? ... >>>Hello Jim ... >>>>everything from the current drive to the SATA, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Reliable 80gb drives
    ... Jim ... >> Since the Netgear SC101 does not support SATA, ... > "The standard IDE and SATA HD technology today is fundamentally ...
    (alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)
  • Re: I want my Saturday back
    ... >SATA is making inroads on the low-end SCSI market. ... >you discover some of the ways that *that* can suck hard. ... At least in the case of SATA they fail one at a time and not in stringy ...
    (alt.sysadmin.recovery)