Re: Forced recovery

On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 04:44:46 +0000, Stuart Lamble wrote:

> Careful, mate. That's sedition, that is. Another couple of weeks, and
> you could find yourself being held without charge for fourteen days for
> that, and if you tell anybody about it, you'll be popped into the
> slammer for up to five years. And if *they* tell anybody about it,
> *they'll* be sent to join you.

So the question is:

Does preemptively registering "notarrestedyet.com" and keeping a register
of how long since registered users last ticked the box to say "I haven't
been arrested yet" actually a violation of the letter of the proposed laws?

I'm sure it's seditious under the wording of the legislation, but by the
sound of it so is "being a wog", "bein' funny lookin'", "lookin' at me
funny", and "annoying someone who kept their fridge magnet".

Oh dear, the sigmonster just signed up with ASIO.
--
Dave Hughes | dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And you don't think the government lets you buy _real_ tinfoil do you?
-- D.C. Ross, the Monastery.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Land of the Free
    ... led the charge, yelling: ... posts to misc.writing, saying ... ... revolution, that's sedition, except when it's not? ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Were listening and were watching YOU!
    ... Servants can not charge sovereigns with sedition, for the simple reason that sovereigns /can not commit/ sedition. ...
    (rec.arts.poems)
  • Re: "Its a different world now"
    ... but the proposed changes to the law are very recent. ... Let's put them in charge. ... the stuff about sedition is what really ...
    (alt.usage.english)