Re: fsck. why bother?
- From: Zebee Johnstone <zebee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Oct 2005 12:17:51 GMT
In alt.sysadmin.recovery on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:10:46 GMT
GB <g.b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Zebee Johnstone <zebee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:slrndlh7mo.4q3.zebee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>> What, you are terribly conflicted about recreating the patriarchy in
>> your relationships, you never ever make the first move, and you worry
>> endlessly about whether worrying about your weight betrays the
>> sisterhood?
>
>
> Er, no. I just like women.
Umm.. that means you are heterosexual. NOthing to be ashamed of as long
as you don't confront people with your heterosexual lifestyle, and
convert them with your heterosexual agenda.
Zebee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- From: Patrick R. Wade
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- References:
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- From: Stuart Lamble
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- From: TimC
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- From: Richard Bos
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- From: Peter
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- From: TimC
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- From: Stuart Lamble
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- From: Zebee Johnstone
- Re: fsck. why bother?
- Prev by Date: Re: Reason #9,653,218 to 'kill all the lawyers' ...
- Next by Date: Re: fsck. why bother?
- Previous by thread: Re: fsck. why bother?
- Next by thread: Re: fsck. why bother?
- Index(es):