Re: Unrecovery by female...
- From: wollman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Garrett Wollman)
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:54:35 +0000 (UTC)
In article <r36rj1pr97ceb8gro0bo7j8gipvqv6k2b9@xxxxxxx>,
Jasper Janssen <jasper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>The law sets a minimum length on shorts and tops? I always thought that
>'Hooters' would be a topless kind of place.
Hooters pretends to be a casual-dining restaurant. I've never been in
one so I can't say how successful they are -- although the food is
obviously not the main attraction.
In most parts of .us, there are legal limits on how little one may
wear in an establishment holding a liquor license. Since the states
can't legally regulate strip clubs out of business, they get around it
by abusing their 21st Amendment authority over "intoxicating liquors"
(on the assumption that most of the patrons in such an establishment
will want to imbibe).
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | As the Constitution endures, persons in every
wollman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | generation can invoke its principles in their own
Opinions not those | search for greater freedom.
of MIT or CSAIL. | - A. Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unrecovery by female...
- From: Chris Suslowicz
- Re: Unrecovery by female...
- From: David Gersic
- Re: Unrecovery by female...
- From: Rick Dickinson
- Re: Unrecovery by female...
- References:
- Re: Unrecovery by female...
- From: Jasper Janssen
- Re: Unrecovery by female...
- Prev by Date: Re: Unrecovery by female...
- Next by Date: Re: Unrecovery by female...
- Previous by thread: Re: Unrecovery by female...
- Next by thread: Re: Unrecovery by female...
- Index(es):