Re: YT will be happy
- From: lbruno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Luis Bruno)
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 18:15:34 +0100
Joe Zeff wrote:
> Any "man" caught by it is a luser and deserves it.
I think you should re-read that book, eh? Maybe the .pt translation made
the relevant passage clearer, but I don't have the original version to
compare. There are, of course, other RISKS; the first to come to mind
answers to the name "vengeance".
> Now, if we could only figure out a way to make one that reaches out
> and bites whenever a luser opens an unrequested attachment...
So true. And I've just seen it. Right *now*. Thankfully, our lab techs
have a somewhat decent amount of paranoia.
Cheers,
--
Luís Bruno
.
- References:
- YT will be happy
- From: Richard Gadsden
- Re: YT will be happy
- From: Joe Zeff
- YT will be happy
- Prev by Date: Re: YT will be happy
- Next by Date: Department of Homeland Security?
- Previous by thread: Re: YT will be happy
- Next by thread: Re: YT will be happy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading