Re: They're all fscking lusers

Anthony de Boer - USEnet <abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> The theory of post-cashier checkers is presumably either that three
> people couldn't possibly all be in cahoots, or just that it's
> sufficiently less probable to cut back on the loss rate.

If you're just wanting to stick one up on your employer, you only need
two in cahoots. The customer need not know anything about it until
they get home and realise they got some of their stuff for free.

--
PGP key ID E85DC776 - finger abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx for full key
/:.*posting.google.com.*/HX-Trace:+j
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Theyre all fscking lusers
    ... >people couldn't possibly all be in cahoots, ... Maybe it's to provide the post-cashier checkers with a bit of extra ... Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+bspfh to contact me. ... We don't have to care, ...
    (alt.sysadmin.recovery)
  • Re: Today confirms Nathan was in SID!
    ... keep singing his praises. ... They in cahoots. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (soc.culture.singapore)
  • Re: Anonymous posters
    ... you aint even funny. ... I think you and fawker are in cahoots. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.local.southwest)
  • Re: Nessy!
    ... >>> They're all in Cahoots ... > I was in Communicado for a few days last week. ... Rob ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.humor.oracle.d)
  • Re: Nessy!
    ... >> They're all in Cahoots ... I was in Communicado for a few days last week. ... "We stand at a moment of transition. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.humor.oracle.d)