Re: 'True' vs. 'Pseudo' Quad Core
- From: Tony Harding <ToHarding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:10:23 -0400
Daddy wrote:
Trying to decide between dual core and quad core for my next Dell desktop.
From what I understand, Intel's current quad-core processors (at least, the ones offered by Dell) are not truly quad core, but more like two dual-core processors glued together. There are four cores there, no doubt, but certain components are shared between the two halves. Obviously, I'm missing a lot of information.
What really is the difference, if anything, between the current generation of Intel quad core processors and a 'true' quad core? This may be a huge question, so I'd be fine with links to more detailed explanations.
Are today's Intel quad-cores a legitimate choice, or are they a 'gimmick', like hyperthreading, something to satisfy the market's demand while they work on the 'real deal'?
I upgraded my XPS720 from a Core2 processor, E6600, to a quad, Q6600, and saw an enormous real world increase in performance when editing & rendering video. Other stuff is instantaneous no matter which CPU.
FWIW, I don't consider hyperthreading a gimmick - it's a way of wringing some extra performance from a single core processor and works the way Intel describes (had one on my Dim8400).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 'True' vs. 'Pseudo' Quad Core
- From: S.Lewis
- Re: 'True' vs. 'Pseudo' Quad Core
- References:
- 'True' vs. 'Pseudo' Quad Core
- From: Daddy
- 'True' vs. 'Pseudo' Quad Core
- Prev by Date: Re: Inspiron 9200 screen problem
- Next by Date: Re: OT: scanning software
- Previous by thread: Re: 'True' vs. 'Pseudo' Quad Core
- Next by thread: Re: 'True' vs. 'Pseudo' Quad Core
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|