Re: Why XP must be saved (according to Infoworld)
- From: "maverick" <maverick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:blows.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:06:20 -0500
"Tony Harding" <ToHard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47960452$0$11585$607ed4bc@xxxxxxxxx
Is that you, Milton? ;)
don't know him.
Dude, chill (& trim). Infoworld has this petition, not me, I posted the
article as a FYI.
appreciate the info.
apologies if my response came across wrong.
nothing at all against you. don't even know you.
BTW, what's the problem with asking your local store to carry a product
or brand you like?
nothing at all.
just that if they refuse to carry the product, you take your
business elsewhere.
if MS puts out crap, i don't buy it.
corporate IT depts buy into MS products for reasons of cost &
efficiency. Windows is ("relatively" speaking), easier to
administer than a Unix based enterprise wide system running,
say Sun based products.
the corporate IT depts have one thing the average consumer
lacks - leverage. piss off your Fortune 100 buyers, and watch
your profits evaporate - and possibly future revenue streams
as they consider switching computing platforms.
the UK school blurb was a good example.
.
- References:
- Why XP must be saved (according to Infoworld)
- From: Tony Harding
- Re: Why XP must be saved (according to Infoworld)
- From: maverick
- Re: Why XP must be saved (according to Infoworld)
- From: Tony Harding
- Why XP must be saved (according to Infoworld)
- Prev by Date: Re: Why XP must be saved (according to Infoworld)
- Next by Date: Re: (OT) That $449+ free ship, 3 years onsite Opti330 w/17"LCD is still up there.
- Previous by thread: Re: Why XP must be saved (according to Infoworld)
- Next by thread: Re: Why XP must be saved (according to Infoworld)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
